February was an extraordinary month within a normally placid bond market. Catalysed by growing inflation expectations, longer-dated bond yields rose by relatively large amounts and the spread of nominal yields and real yields widened. This had an immediate negative impact on growth stocks, which declined, while reflation stocks rebounded.
View full commentary here
February was an extraordinary month within a normally placid bond market. Catalysed by growing inflation expectations, longer-dated bond yields rose by relatively large amounts and the spread of nominal yields and real yields widened. This had an immediate negative impact on growth stocks, which declined, while reflation stocks rebounded.
We have long argued that inflation is arguably the most significant risk facing the stock market and we continue to vigilantly monitor that risk. Some of the Fund’s positions that should benefit from inflation and performed well, as anticipated, during Feb-21 include ING, Epiroc, Mowi, CME, Vulcan Materials, and Flow Traders. Meanwhile, the Fund’s growthier’ stocks that we anticipate to be most negatively impacted by rising rates were the weaker performers during the month and include, Thermo Fisher, Alibaba, Sunrun, and Electronic Arts. In aggregate the stocks performed as we would expect given an inflation scare, which provides us with a working compass should we choose to tilt the portfolio more meaningfully towards the reflation trade.
The Fund remained relatively unchanged during the month and we added just one ‘growthier’ stock that was sold off during Feb-21. In aggregate, the portfolio remains highly differentiated from the market with 45% invested in the US Vs the Benchmark’s 57%, 27% invested in Europe (ex-UK) Vs the Benchmark’s 13%, and 18% invested in Emerging Markets Vs the Benchmark’s 13%. It is a similar story when viewed along with sector exposure with the Fund meaningfully overweight Materials and underweight Information Technology and does not own a single FAANG stock.
By our analysis, the Fund has an approx. 5.5% FCF yield, 8% revenue growth, and <1x net debt/EBITDA, all of which compare favourably to the market. These factors coupled with our diversification and various risk controls give us confidence in the outlook for the Fund.
![]() |
Alibaba Group Holding LTD | China | Consumer Discretionary |
![]() |
Charter Communications Inc | United States | Communication Services |
![]() |
Cigna Corp | United States | Health Care |
![]() |
Houlihan Lokey Inc | United States | Financials |
![]() |
Indus Towers Ltd | India | Communication Services |
![]() |
Lumentum | United States | Information Technology |
![]() |
Pinterest Inc | United States | Communication Services |
![]() |
Rakuten Inc | Japan | Consumer Discretionary |
![]() |
Tencent Holdings | China | Communication Services |
![]() |
UnitedHealth Group Inc | United States | Health Care |
1 Month | 1 Year | 3 Years P.A. | 5 Years P.A. | SINCE INCEPTION | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fund | 1.4% | 19.4% | 12.7% | 12.8% | 11.6% |
Benchmark | 1.4% | 8.5% | 10.5% | 12.4% | 10.0% |
February was an extraordinary month within a normally placid bond market. Catalysed by growing inflation expectations, longer-dated bond yields rose by relatively large amounts and the spread of nominal yields and real yields widened. This had an immediate negative impact on growth stocks, which declined, while reflation stocks rebounded.
We have long argued that inflation is arguably the most significant risk facing the stock market and we continue to vigilantly monitor that risk. Some of the Fund’s positions that should benefit from inflation and performed well, as anticipated, during Feb-21 include ING, Epiroc, Mowi, CME, Vulcan Materials, and Flow Traders. Meanwhile, the Fund’s growthier’ stocks that we anticipate to be most negatively impacted by rising rates were the weaker performers during the month and include, Thermo Fisher, Alibaba, Sunrun, and Electronic Arts. In aggregate the stocks performed as we would expect given an inflation scare, which provides us with a working compass should we choose to tilt the portfolio more meaningfully towards the reflation trade.
The Fund remained relatively unchanged during the month and we added just one ‘growthier’ stock that was sold off during Feb-21. In aggregate, the portfolio remains highly differentiated from the market with 45% invested in the US Vs the Benchmark’s 57%, 27% invested in Europe (ex-UK) Vs the Benchmark’s 13%, and 18% invested in Emerging Markets Vs the Benchmark’s 13%. It is a similar story when viewed along with sector exposure with the Fund meaningfully overweight Materials and underweight Information Technology and does not own a single FAANG stock.
By our analysis, the Fund has an approx. 5.5% FCF yield, 8% revenue growth, and <1x net debt/EBITDA, all of which compare favourably to the market. These factors coupled with our diversification and various risk controls give us confidence in the outlook for the Fund.
VOLATILITY3 | 9.4% | NUMBER OF STOCKS | 36 |
BETA4 | 0.76 | MAXIMUM DRAW DOWN | -9.4% |
CIO
The Pengana International Ethical Fund is a long only fund that holds 30-50 companies across developed and developing markets, large and small companies. The Fund predominantly invests in companies that deliver stable yet growing free cash flow throughout cycles (which we classify as ‘Core’ holdings) whilst also taking positions in more cyclical companies (‘Cyclical’) and those whose valuation has been materially misconstrued by the market (‘Opportunistic’). We avoid investment in companies that are, in our opinion, harmful to people, animals or the environment.
1. Net performance figures are shown after all fees and expenses and assume reinvestment of distributions. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance, the value of investments can go up and down.
2. A new strategy was implemented for the Pengana International Ethical Fund from 1 July 2017 by the Pengana team. The financial information refers to the strategy currently employed by the Pengana International Ethical.
From July 2017, performance figures are those of the Pengana International Ethical Fund (the “Fund”) class A units (net of fees). Between July 2015 and June 2017, performance figures have been recalculated by adjusting the Pengana International Fund’s (ARSN 610 351 641) net returns to reflect the management fee of the Fund. From July 2017 the Fund has been managed by the same team and with the same portfolio construction strategy as the Pengana International Fund, complemented by strict ESG filters and processes. The Pengana International Fund’s net track record data is historical. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. The value of the investment can go up or down.
3. Annualised standard deviation since inception.
4. Relative to the MSCI All Country World Total Return Index in AUD.
*For further information regarding fees please see the PDS available on our website.